logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019. 04. 05. 선고 2018두66326 판결
(심리불속행)상속세 및 증여세법 제45조 제1항에 의한 재산취득자금 증여추정이 적용되는 경우에 있어 반증 사실에 대한 입증은 납세자에게 있음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court-2018-Nu-10050 ( November 14, 2018)

Title

(In the case of application of the presumption of donation of funds to acquire property under Article 45(1) of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act, there is a taxpayer to prove that there is any proof of counter-proof.

Summary

(b)In the event a person without a certain occupation or income does not have the source of funds sufficient to obtain the said property from the person without such occupation or income, and his lineal ascendant or spouse, etc. is deemed to have received the said funds from the person having such ability to obtain the said property.

Related statutes

Article 45 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act: Estimated donation of funds for acquiring property

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2018Du66326

Plaintiff-Appellant

Prosecution ○

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court (Chowon) Decision 2018Nu10050 Decided November 14, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

2019.04.05

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are examined.

The argument regarding the appeal is without merit because it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

arrow