logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.07.16 2015고단2792
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Narcotics Control Act;

A. On August 1, 2014, the Defendant, on August 1, 2014, received approximately 0.3 grams from C in return for remitting KRW 300,000 to the name account in the vicinity of the Kuchio apartment apartment in the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant received approximately 0.3 grams from C in return for remitting KRW 300,000 to the name account.

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant traded psychotropic drugs.

(2) On August 10, 2014, the Defendant committed the crime of August 10, 2014, received approximately 0.5 grams from C in return for remitting KRW 200,000 to the account in the name of E located in Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Dong-gu.

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant traded psychotropic drugs.

(3) On August 2014, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed Habman on August 2014, 201, received approximately KRW 200,000 from C in return for remitting KRW 200,000 to the wife F’s account in the vicinity of the above E.

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant traded psychotropic drugs.

B. On September 2014, 2014, the Defendant received approximately 0.3g of philophones 0.3g, which were clicked by C in the vicinity of the above E, for the first time.

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, he received psychotropic drugs-related philophones.

C. (1) The Defendant, on February 20, 2015, dypon medication (1) dypon medication, dyponing around February 20, 2015 at the Defendant’s house located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon to dypon in coffee.

Accordingly, the Defendant administered psychotropic drugs, even though he is not a narcotics handler.

(2) On March 29, 2015, the Defendant drank approximately 0.1g of philopon from the Defendant’s house at the same time to coffee around March 29, 2015.

Accordingly, the Defendant administered psychotropic drugs, even though he is not a narcotics handler.

2. Violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc.;

(a) the receipt of marijuana;

arrow