A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 246] The facts charged also contain the fact that the defendant took a bath against the Assistant E, but the prosecutor did not prosecute the facts as a crime of insult, and the defendant cannot be prosecuted to the effect that he threatened the public official performing his duties. As such, among the facts charged, the part corresponding to the obstruction of the performance of official duties (the part of assault against the public official performing his duties) among the facts charged is organized as follows and recognized the facts charged.

At around 00:30 on August 25, 2013, the Defendant committed assault, such as 00:0 on August 25, 2013, on the ground that the Defendant was placed on the floor and lying the Defendant, who was at the seat of F, who was working in the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station D district located in Manan-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Seoul, and that the Defendant was at the seat of F, and that the Defendant was at the seat of the Defendant, where the said F is not returned, was placed on the floor, she was removed, and she was able to wear his/her bridge on his/her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers working in a global situation for the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

【Court Decision 2014Da385】 without any changes in indictment to the extent that it does not substantially disadvantage the defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense, the following facts charged are organized and recognized:

On February 15, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the victim's coffee business by force between 25 minutes and 25 minutes, on the ground that the Defendant avoided tobacco at the H coffee shop located in G on February 15, 2014, and the victim I, an employee, reported it to the police.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment of the court below]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A damaged photograph 【2014 Highest385】

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to I and J

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act for criminal facts (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties) and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of official duties).