beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court-2018-Reu-129 ( November 14, 2018)
Title
(Influence of Hearing) The omission of a determination on any matter not asserted by a party shall not be deemed a ground for a retrial.
Summary
(2) The court below's decision is justified. (3) The court below's decision is justified. (4) The court below's decision is erroneous. (4) The court below's decision is erroneous. (4) The court below's decision is erroneous. (1) The court below's decision is erroneous. (1) The court below's decision is erroneous.
Related statutes
Article 451 (Grounds for Retrial)
Cases
2018Du66135 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax
Plaintiff-Appellant
CHAPTER A
Defendant-Appellee
BB Director of the Tax Office
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2018Nu129 Decided November 14, 2018
Imposition of Judgment
March 28, 2019
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff (the plaintiff, the appointed party) and the chairmanCC.
Reasons
The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. The appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition