logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.08.24 2016고단2270
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 17, 2015, at around 05:40 on September 17, 2015, the Defendant, who was aware of C, drinks together with C at the E restaurant located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

At that place, C was bread and plucked with F's arms, plucked against F's head on the wall, and blicked with C's head on the wall. After that, C was killed in the patrol vehicle, and blicked with C's head on the patrol vehicle, and observed C's head on the blick in accordance with safety of the patrol vehicle.

Nevertheless, on May 24, 2016, the Defendant appeared to take an oath on May 24, 2016, the Seoul Northern District Court No. 502, 749, Seoul Northern District Court No. 502, 2015, Madan4125, Ma C as a witness of the assault case, and then, (1) the prosecutor’s “Defendant (C)” has a permanent domicile to have his houseed.

“Ashes to see the question.”

Albagy required.

2. The prosecutor examines the head of the police station in accordance with the safety between the back seat of the patrol vehicle and the front seat.

“Influence of the question”

3. Whether the defendant has a permanent domicile that he was born at the time of his head

“n't need to be asked.”

Fame Hack Hack

The answer to ".............. the prosecutor confirmed that the defendant was faced with the victim FC and the wall.

“Influence of the question”

The answer to "," and 5. The prosecutor's "the defendant is plicking, plucking, plucking, etc., of the victim FC."

“Influence and outline of the question.”

6.3 6. 6. 6.3 6. 6. 6. The Prosecutor’s answer that “the Defendant is clicking with the Victim F. F. Sheet.”

“Influence and outline of the question.”

The testimony was made to the effect that “C was not dried, F was not dried, and did not harm the patrol car,” such as the answer.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.Each.

arrow