1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a company producing building materials, such as Busan Busan Metropolitan City, etc., and F is a worker employed by the Defendant on October 18, 2012.

B. In order to prevent the sprinking around the asphalt tank and piping around the above Amp tank, the Defendant’s plant located in Boh City, Boh City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor 1 and 2 Lpart, in which the Ppart was carried out a string of the Ppart in the underground. In order to prevent the sprinking, the heat media oil pipelines installed and distributed approximately 220 degrees of heat media oil pipelines with the heat media oil pipelines at all times. Of note, the above Amp 1 and 2m in the underground space (aro, vertical length, approximately 2m in depth) where the spart leaked leaked from the Hp tank was carried out, and the Defendant’s employees frequently carried out the sprinking and replacement of the sprinking to the extent that the sprinking and replacement was frequently carried out.

C. On October 26, 2012, F was performing divers work at 2 Amra, Busan Busan High Court Decision 2, 2012, but around 17:40, F, due to lack of raw materials, failed to stop the machine, and entered the underground space (hereinafter “instant underground space”) in the lower part of the 2nd printing process with the direction of the head of the Defendant Company G, thereby removing the asphalt molds by using the electric divers.

However, around October 26, 2012, around 18:30 on October 26, 2012, in the underground space of the instant case, electricity flame was contacted with the oil vapor in a sudden heat media oil vapor, and F died of a fire from its place to its flame image.

(hereinafter “instant accident”).

E. The Plaintiffs jointly inherited each 1/3 of the net F’s properties as siblings of the network F.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and 11, the court of first instance, the president of the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, and the president of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation, respectively, are all the arguments.