1. The Defendant’s certification of organic agricultural products (certification number: B) issued to the Plaintiff on October 21, 2017 shall be revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 1, 2016, the Plaintiff obtained certification of eco-friendly organic agricultural products (certification number : B) from the Defendant, a certifying institution of the National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service, on the following content with respect to four kinds of varieties cultivated by the Plaintiff pursuant to the Act on the Fostering of Environment-Friendly Agriculture and Fisheries and the Management of and Support for Organic Food, Etc. (hereinafter “Environmental-Friendly Agriculture and Fisheries Act”).

The term of validity of certified organic agricultural products shall be from December 1, 2016 to November 30, 2017, A (C) business registration number (date of birth) D in Seoul Special Self-Governing Province, the location of Seoul Special Self-Governing Province, Namwon-si, Namwon-si, Jeollabuk-do, and the size of 24,99 square meters of a 4 variety cultivation area of 14,96 square meters of a certified organic agricultural product, other than the

B. On September 13, 2017, the remaining office of the National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service support to North Korea, etc. (hereinafter “the farmland in this case”) issued a collection of samples for the Plaintiff’s inspection of the melons produced by the Plaintiff and the remaining agrochemicals of the vegetable seedlings. On September 21, 2017, on September 21, 2017, the remaining office of the National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service informed the Plaintiff of detection of 1 prodial 0.04mg/kg, an agrochemical ingredient.

C. On September 24, 2017, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to re-examine the funeral, and the Defendant collected approximately 2 kmg (hereinafter “the instant funeral”) from among the seedlings planted on the farmland of this case as samples from the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s spouse on September 24, 2017. As a result, on September 29, 2017, the Plaintiff requested the Jeonju University to inspect the samples, and discovered agrochemicals (hereinafter “the result of the instant inspection”) with respect to the pesticide residues remaining on September 29, 2017 as follows:

On October 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that “In the investigation into the production process of a farmer source, proteo agricultural products were detected in accordance with Article 24(1)2 and Article 34(4) of the Environment-Friendly Agriculture and Fisheries Act (Articles 31(4) and 34(5)) of the Environment-Friendly Agriculture and Fisheries Act on the ground that “In the course of the investigation into the production process of a farmer source, proteo products were detected in 0.04mg/km; (b) 0.027mg/km; and (c) 0.027mg/km as a result of the confirmation of proteo production certification.”