A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 12, 2014, at around 00:45, the Defendant damaged public goods, at the front of the C Hospital located in B, and on the front of the C Hospital, “by two South Koreas, following a woman,” the Defendant attempted to move the F to the police station by hanging the Defendant at the 48Mo724 patrol car, when it was confirmed that the slope E belonging to the D District of the luminous Police Station called out after receiving a report 112 and verifying personal information by checking the Defendant’s work and checking personal information.

Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) opened the front seat of the patrol vehicle that he wanted to start, explained the reasons for the arrest by the slope G, and (b) took the Defendant’s desire to read the defect from the vehicle, “a police officer, a bit of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” and damaged the said patrol vehicle used by public offices in such a way as to cover the body at the top top line of the patrol vehicle, thereby impairing the repair cost.

2. At around 03:41 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender under suspicion of damage to public goods, such as the foregoing paragraph (1), and was examined by judicial police officers, such as slope H, etc.; and (b) forged the signature of the first name without authority for the purpose of exercising the right to write “I” in the investigation process confirmation document attached to the above protocol, which was prepared by the above H, etc.; and (c) in the investigation process confirmation document attached to the above protocol, the Defendant forged the signature of the first name without authority for the purpose of exercising the authority.

After that, the Defendant submitted to the above H, etc. that he was aware of the forgery as if the signature of the I as stated in the above protocol and written confirmation was duly formed, and used each forged signature as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry of the police suspect interrogation protocol (including investigation process confirmation) of I and the presence of I;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of damage to goods for public use) and Article 141 of the relevant Act on criminal facts;