A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 28, 2016, the Defendant: (a) sought to enter the entrance of a bicycle from the entrance door of the Daegu-gu Metropolitan City Office in Daegu-ro 88, Daegu-ro, Seoul-ro, to a government office building.

피고 인은 청원경찰인 C으로부터 자전거를 밖에 두고 오라는 말을 듣자 “ 씨 발 놈 아, 자물쇠 안 가져 왔다 ”라고 욕설을 하면서 위 C의 왼쪽 정강이를 1회 차고 손으로 C의 얼굴을 1회 때렸으며, 청원경찰인 D가 위 C을 때리는 피고인을 말리자 D의 가슴을 수회 밀치고, 그 정강이를 수회 찼다.

The defendant continued to witness the above situation of E who is the police assigned for special guard, sworn the defendant's chest E in several times, and assault both scarcitys several times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the office building and the control of access of the police assigned for special guard.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D, C, and E;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act were sentenced by the Daegu District Court on April 19, 2016 to four months in prison, and the above case is still pending in the final appeal court on the ground that the defendant visited the viewing in order to file a civil petition against the irregularities, etc. of cleaning agency, but tried to set up the viewing channel to not lose the bicycle, and the police assigned for special guard intended to install bicycles outside of the bicycle, he spit and assault the bath and assault against the police assigned for special guard, obstructed the public duties of the police assigned for special guard, interfered with the defendant's business, interfered with the defendant's business, or was punished for the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assault, etc.). However, although the above judgment was not yet finalized at the same time, the above case was tried at the same time, the defendant's age, age, character, intelligence, environment, motive, motive, crime, etc. of the defendant.