The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although there is a fact that the police officer assigned for special guard resisting the defendant who intends to enter the office of the head of the Gu (fact-finding) in the summary of the grounds for appeal, there is no fact of threatening the defendant to take a bath or take drinking.

2. The Defendant also asserted the same as the trial in the lower court, and the lower court determined that the facts charged were recognized based on the evidence duly admitted and examined.

Examining the above judgment of the court below in comparison with the records, since it is recognized that the defendant obstructed the legitimate execution of duties of the police assigned for special guard regarding the maintenance and protection of the order of the office building of the C-Gu Office, the judgment below cannot be deemed to have erred

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.