Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for ten months, respectively.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants offered a proposal to the effect that the Defendants had worked as a used car with a used car with a used car with a corporate body in Seo-gu Incheon, and that the fact was that the Defendants had no intention to establish and operate the corporate body and offered loans by putting up the transaction performance repeatedly by setting up the account from the person who was unaware of the name to increase credit by putting in and withdrawing from the opening of the account. The Defendants established and registered the term “old-age corporation” and opened an account in the name of the corporate body, and had the means of access, which is linked to the said account, provided the passbook and the physical card to the above person who was unaware of the name.

1. False entry and events, such as public electromagnetic records;

A. On January 3, 2019, Defendant A prepared an application for the establishment registration of a corporation in accordance with the proposal of a person who has no intention to operate the “work loan” without the intention to operate the “work loan” at the Sungsung registry office located in the Gyeonggi-do Sungsung-do, and submitted it to the public official in charge of registration, and filed an application for the establishment registration of a corporation.

A public official in charge of the above registration, who is unaware of such circumstance, entered the computer system in order to complete the registration of incorporation of “D” in the corporate register, and kept the said computerized corporate register in which the aforementioned false fact was recorded.

Accordingly, the Defendant filed a false report with respect to a public official to record false facts in the corporate register in the same electronic records as the original of the notarial deed, and had him keep them in the electronic register, and thereafter exercised it from that time to that time by the same method as in the attached Table 1-1, the Defendant filed a false report to a public official three times in total, such as in the attached Table 7 of the same month, and had him record false facts in the corporate register in the same electronic records as the original of the notarial

B. Defendant B is the actual director of the Namyang-si registry located in the Namyang-do, Gyeonggi-do on May 28, 2019.