beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 8, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on February 29, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Daejeon District Court on February 29, 2012. On March 5, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Daejeon District Court on March 5, 2009. On February 9, 2007, the Defendant had a record of being sentenced to a summary order of one million won of fine.
[2013 Highest 1274] On January 30, 2013, the Defendant driven C cab from the front side of the canter restaurant in Daejeon Taedong-gu, Daejeon, with a blood alcohol content of 0.10% to that of 0.102% under the influence of alcohol on January 30, 2013.
[2013 Highest 1779]
1. On January 29, 2013, at around 13:30 on January 29, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s chest on the street before the Daejeon Dong-dong, Daejeon, on the ground that the victim D (29 years of age) laid away her cigarette butts in front of the Daedong-dong, Daejeon-dong, Daejeon, he saw the victim into a breath, spath and spath, and boomed the victim’s spath on the floor.
2. On January 31, 2013, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) around 19:45, at the main point of “G” operated by the Victim F (year 31) of the Victim F (year 31) in the Daejeon Dong-gu E-2, Daejeon, the Defendant was unable to perform funeral services for the victim. If the Defendant did so, the Defendant was able to perform funeral services for the victim. If the Defendant did not know any longer, the Defendant was able to do so, and the Defendant was able to talk with the victim, and the Defendant was able to keep the customer from entering the said main point, such as arbitrarily 35 minutes of the market price of scarblus, which is equivalent to 130,000 won of the market price being kept in the display stand.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main operation by force.
Summary of Evidence
[2013 Highest 1274]
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A report on detection of a host driver and a circumstantial report on the host driver;
1. The register of driver's licenses;