logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2012.10.25 2011고단2449
부정수표단속법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for up to eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date the above judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A is the representative director of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Company D (hereinafter referred to as “D”) and Co-Defendant E is a separate co-defendant E as a director, and the Defendants entered into a contract with Korea Bank and Dong branch and Defendant A share table around December 13, 2010, and E was delegated by Defendant A with the authority to issue a check.

E With the authority to issue a check from A after accepting the foregoing D and delegated by B with the authority to issue a check from B on July 201, 201, the check number “G”, “50,000,000 won”, and one copy of the number of shares per bank in the name of A with the blank of Issuance Date, and the same year for which the holder is within the time limit for payment.

9. 20. 20. The date of issuance to the above bank was set aside as follows: (i) payment proposal was made; (ii) payment was not due to the shortage of deposits.

E, in addition to this, in the same way, issued a total of four par value per four times, including No. 3,4,8, and9, a total of 200 million won per share of the attached list of crimes, and decided not to pay the shortage of deposits.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with E, issued a check of shares and did not receive a disposition of suspension of transaction.

around August 7, 2011, E issued a check number “H”, “60,00,000 won”, and the date of issuance “F.4 November 4, 2011” in the same year under the name of D representative director A of the corporation D representative director A, which was the date of payment proposal, and issued a check number “H”, “H”, “60,000,000 won” at the coffee shop located in Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Island, and decided not to receive the disposition of suspension of transaction.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with E, issued a check of shares and did not receive a disposition of suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

"2011 Highest 2449"

1. Each legal statement of the defendant and E;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and I;

1. The accusation book, the certified transcript of corporate register, the comprehensive transfer, the receipt and transfer statement, the letter of business registration, the register of shareholders, the register of shareholders;

1. Defendant and E, respectively.

arrow