logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.12.19 2013고단3438
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 15, 2013, the Defendant received a report that “the principal offender is leading to a disturbance” on the front side of the KT in Yangsan-si, Seosan-si, and made it difficult for the Defendant to proceed to avoid a disturbance on the following grounds: (a) the police officer of the Gyeongyangsan Police Station B police box, etc. dispatched to the site, asked the Defendant to answer the instant case; (b) the Defendant refused to answer; and (c) the Defendant “Isn't receive money from him or her; and (d) the Defendant’s “Isk’s kn

Therefore, on the ground that the above C et al. restrains them and solicits them to return home, they assaulted C's chests and vessels with both hand, and walking the bridge on several occasions.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers of the above C.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at a time, at the same time, and at the same place as mentioned in the above paragraph 1, and at the same time and place, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the public goods by drinking 27,500 won at the end of the Donsansan Police Station B police box, the patroler of the Donnam-gu Police Station B police box; and (b) damaging the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Attachment, etc. of photographs of damaged vehicles);

1. Articles 136(1) and 141(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) considering the fact that the Defendant, on June 30, 201, was sentenced to imprisonment for four months due to damage to public goods at the Ulsan District Court on June 30, 201; (b) the fact that there was a past record of two years of suspended execution; and (c) the fact that the instant crime is not likely to be injured; and (d) the confession, confession, and reflects the fact

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow