A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 4, 2015, at around 21:55, the Defendant was faced with disturbance, such as hinginging under the influence of alcohol in front of 34,34, U.S. Mau apartment 102, the Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, “I ambly, I amben, I amben, I amben, I am amben, I am amben, I amben, I am amben, I am amben, I am amben, I am amben, I am amben, I am am amben, I am amben, I am amben, I am am amben, and amben C am

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Report on the occurrence of the case;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. According to the sentencing guidelines for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the crime of this case constitutes the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6 to 14 months).

However, in light of the circumstances such as the fact that the Defendant was divided into depth after the instant crime and deposited a part of the amount for the repayment of damage, and that there was no criminal record other than the one fine, and that the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime under the influence of alcohol and contingently, the punishment as ordered in the Disposition shall be determined.