logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.05.19 2016고단34
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 11:00 on June 30, 2015, and around the third and sixth class classes of D secondary school D in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; (b) around the same day, around 09:45 on the same day, the victim E of the student father of the above school took a bath while giving the Defendant’s children’s ushesheer Fushes; and (c) N expressed the above classroom as a hsheet.”

B. A. B. D. “A. I had the victim during the class by sound, added a part of the part on the part of the victim in front of the hallway, her hand, her hand, and then she should she take the victim’s bath by her hand, “A. I would like her her to take the victim by her hand, and her hand at the face of the victim, and her hand, her hand, her hand, led to the victim’s door by her hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning school classes and student guidance of educational public officials.

2. On October 24, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime at around October 24, 2015: (a) around 11:10, around 2015, at a street room facing the 104 sexual bus terminal located in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu; (b) the police box belonging to the Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Nowon-gu, Police Station Hamb, dispatched to the site after receiving a report from the above F that the Defendant was identified by G, and notified the Defendant of the fact of suspicion after stopping the police box, and informed the Defendant of the fact of suspicion, and attempted to identify the personal information, and then the Defendant threatened the chest part of the said I only once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to E and I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for a crime under the relevant provision of the Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Sentencing Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act.

arrow