1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 20,524,592 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) KRW 2,50,000 to Plaintiff C and each of the said money.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A and B jointly run the F frequency collection in Suwon-gu, Busan, and the Defendant is a couple who operates the G frequency collection in the above E, and Plaintiff C is the mother of Plaintiff A.

B. At around 12:20 on September 23, 2015, the Defendant had knife with the Plaintiff B, who had knifeed the knife with the knife with the knife with the knife and knife with the knife with the knife.

The Defendant was the main owner of the E’s frequency in the previous day, H and Si guard. On the ground that the Defendant brought Plaintiff B’s knife knife in the G frequency book among the Sics, and sought to return the knife to the said H, the Defendant collected the Plaintiff B’s knife knife (23cm in the knife length, 8cm in the length, and 36cm in the length of the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife).

(hereinafter “instant assault act”). C.

B. The defendant

As in the paragraph, the plaintiff A, the husband of the plaintiff B, who is the husband of the plaintiff B, has driven the disturbance as an emergency stairs in front of the F frequency.

The Defendant was criticized from the Plaintiff that “I kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't.

As seen in this paragraph, the Defendant collected the knife knife, which was laid on the floor and left away from the floor, and the Plaintiff “nife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife A, and caused damage to the left-hand knife and power line, etc.

(hereinafter “instant injury”). D.

B. The defendant

entry in paragraphs (c) and (c)

Pursuant to the facts charged as stated in the subsection, the act of special intimidation against I and J, and the act of intimidation against K, the Busan District Court was indicted under the Busan District Court's 2015Kadan2324 (hereinafter "the instant criminal litigation"), and the said court's aforementioned judgment on May 18, 2016.

Innocence of the facts constituting the crime stated in the paragraph.