1. The plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's claim expanded in the trial are all dismissed.

2. Demanding and expanding the costs of appeal.

1. The scope of the judgment of the court of first instance requested the removal of the wall of this case and the delivery of the part of the wall of this case, and the court of first instance ordered the defendant to remove the wall of this case and deliver the part of the wall of this case, and the defendant removed the wall of this case after the judgment of the court of first instance, and delivered the land to the plaintiff for the part of the wall of this case. It seems that the plaintiff arbitrarily performed the duty of order in the judgment of the court of first instance.

As to a claim for payment of money, the first instance court rendered a judgment citing only part of unjust enrichment on the land on the wall part of this case, and only the Plaintiff appealed. As such, the scope of this court’s judgment is limited to the Plaintiff’s claim for payment of money, excluding unjust enrichment on the land on the wall part of this case.

2. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the contents or images of Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 22 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of a request for a voluntary appraisal by the court of first instance for expert E.

On April 20, 2006, the Defendant entered into a loan agreement with the Gwangju City with respect to the lease term of B 261 square meters, C 241 square meters and F 84 square meters in the name of the Republic of Korea with respect to each of the instant land (hereinafter “instant land”), “instant land” and “F land,” each of which is referred to as “each of the instant land,” and “each of the instant land,” each of which is referred to as “each of the instant land,” and thereafter, entered into a concrete floor, fence, warehouse, telegraph, and transformer, etc. on each of the instant land from March 28, 2006 to December 31, 2006.

B. On December 28, 2005, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Republic of Korea for each of the instant land under the name of the Republic of Korea as Seoul Central District Court 2005dan404837.