logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.03.31 2015가단132390
손실분담금 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's primary claim is dismissed in entirety.

2. Litigation costs between the Plaintiff and the Defendants are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The basic factual basis and the Defendants, etc., which are the premise of the determination, are the persons who were engaged in activities together with the Internet Carbook (M “M” or “N”, but theO which was subject to tax laws against its members held an investment explanation meeting in advance in 2012. The Plaintiff and the Defendants, etc., present the investment explanation meeting, at which they jointly make an investment with theO, and newly build an urban-type residential house (so-called “so-called “so-type residential house”) in Sejong Special Self-Governing City prior to the division and merger and new construction of a new urban-type residential house (so-called “so-type residential house”) in Q 48 m2 and Q 536 m2 in order to collect the investment principal and profits, etc. by selling them, and there is no dispute between the parties as to the fact that they jointly made an investment in the manner requested by theO as follows.

Defendant 20, 100, 200, 200. 10, 200, 10, 200. 40, 200, 200, 200, 200. 10,000, 205, 200. 10, 200, 200, 200, 200. 10, 10,000, 200, 10, 200, 200. 10, 10, 200, 10, 200, 200, 10, 200, 10, 100, 200, 205, 200, 100, 200, 100, 200, 200, 300, 205, 2000, 201

2. Determination on the grounds of each of the claims in this case by the Plaintiff

A. The plaintiff is the primary cause of the claim in this case, and the "Plaintiff" is the actual business site related to the studio construction project in this case from the defendants.

arrow