logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.22 2014가합8535
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff (consolidated defendants) is jointly and severally liable for 37,489,760 won to the defendant (consolidated plaintiffs) and their related thereto from February 18, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties concerned Plaintiff A is a person who was subject to co-fluence at the Seoul National University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) operated by the Defendant, and Plaintiff C is the spouse of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D, B, and E are children of Plaintiff A.

B. The Plaintiff A’s flag spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic and spathic spathic spathic spathics under the diagnosis of spathic spathics.

C. (1) On May 25, 2013, Plaintiff A had two copies on the rear dubal part of the Defendant Hospital and did not properly control due to earthquake control. On May 28, 2013, Plaintiff A confirmed that brain self-explosion video (MRI) tests conducted by an external hospital and the computerizing body of cerebrovascular (CTA) tests were applied to the emergency room of the Defendant hospital around May 29, 2013. (2) On May 30, 2013, Plaintiff A confirmed that the results of the cerebrscular surgery tests conducted by the Defendant hospital around May 30, 2013 confirmed that there was a high risk of malutism, such as the right-hand traffic along the upper side, the left-hand side, the left-hand side, and the upper part of the transport connection, and that there was a high risk of malutism.

On June 17, 2013, Plaintiff A hospitalized in Defendant Hospital on or around June 17, 2013 in order to undergo a curative treatment procedure. 2) The medical personnel of Defendant Hospital, on or around 10:55 on June 18, 2013, performed crypryprying on the upper right side of the traffic transport beer, and thereafter performed crypryprying on the left side of the traffic beer.

(hereinafter referred to as "the instant co-operation" . 3, however, at the time of the completion of the procedure, small blood cells was observed at the Plaintiff's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer, and the medical professionals at Defendant Hospital were able to confirm whether the size of the blood cells increased again after 30 minutes or 1 hours, and the Plaintiff was broken in anesthesia at the time.

arrow