logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.02.14 2017고단3888
전파법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

However, the defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is an employee of the Daejeon mid-gu D and 201 who runs an information and communications service business.

IMFI is an international mobile device identification number used for the purpose of maintaining and managing a mobile phone, such as opening of a mobile phone and registering theft or loss, and a domestic telecommunications company is granted one IMF per mobile phone and can only open multiple mobile phones with the same IMF.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) abused the fact that a telecommunications company paid opening fees and did not recover opening fees when the amount of calls generated in excess of a certain level for three months; and (b) abused the fact that management of openings, etc. of the International MFI only; (c) opened a new mobile phone in the name of the branch; (d) sold high-priced new mobile phone to a domestic mobile phone operator in the form of KRW 50-650,000 per unit; and (e) fabricated the contents of the phone from an online mobile phone to receive support for opening fees, etc. by artificially manipulating the contents of the phone from an online mobile phone operator.

On January 7, 2016, the Defendant purchased in cash 9.5 million won a so-called “Stol program”, which is an illegal program from a person in an unsound name, and installed on a computer within the aforementioned mobile phone sales store; inserted a core chip separate from a reporter’s new mobile phone, who has obtained the certification of conformity assessment by the National Institute of Radio Waves, into a mobile phone, and then subjected the aforementioned large chip to a computer which is connected to a “Stol program”, and made the said medium chip by forcing the IMO of the new mobile phone to enter it into the “Stol program”, and then made it possible to recognize the use of the new mobile phone as the use of the said mobile phone.

In addition, the Defendant from around that time to February 2017.

arrow