The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On March 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 22:20 on March 15, 2016, at the crosswalk of D’s pharmacy located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (b) brought the victim E (27 years) a walk in the atmosphere in the signal signal in the state of Ortoba; (c) thereby putting the victim into the floor on the victim’s galthm falthm, when she tried to see and erode the victim’s balthoth hand by cutting down the victim’s balthoth hand with the victim’s balthoth hand.

As a result, the Defendant destroyed the cost of repairing KRW 318,00 by damaging the cell phone clocks owned by the victim.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and examined by the court below, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the Defendant intentionally damaged the victim’s mobile phone, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the same.

Witness

In this Court, F stated in this Court that “The Defendant and the victim observed the seat of the crosswalk at the time, the Defendant and the victim were able to take a bath with each other, and the Defendant showed that he was cleeped of the victim’s clock, but the Defendant did not cleep the victim’s cell phone in the process of scambing the victim’s scam.”

The victim E found the fact that there is no cell phone after moving to the police station along with the defendant, and asked the other group to find the cell phone and bring it to the police station.

At the time of the police station investigation, the defendant did not request compensation for damage to the mobile phone, and the police officer in charge asked about how to compensate for damage to the mobile phone.

“The Defendant made a statement to the effect that it was “,” and even according to the above statement itself, the Defendant’s stokes the victim’s stoke because the cell phone was destroyed by a vehicle that fell from the floor.