(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.10.28 2019고정410

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.10.28 2019고정410

상해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 16:00 on July 31, 2019, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the money received by the victim D (hereinafter “C”) in the “C” restaurant located in Seojin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seojin-gu; and (b) took care of the money received by the victim; and (c) took care of the money returned again; and (d) took care of the victim’s cell phone on the table, the Defendant damaged the amount information film of KRW 10,00 in the market value by cutting the victim’s cell phone on the table to the floor.

2. On the ground that the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance as above at the time, time, and place as mentioned in the above paragraph (1), the Defendant suffered injury, such as “influoral salt,” in which the Defendant was able to wear clothes of the Defendant and display the body of the victim out of our house in the future, resulting in the Defendant’s scambling of the body of the victim by carrying the victim’s hand, and caused the Defendant to inflict on him about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Report on occurrence of a crime;

1. A written estimate for an investigation report;

1. The written diagnosis of injury (the defendant and his defense counsel claimed that the victim's cell phone was damaged by the victim's cell phone or not sealed the victim's body. The victim stated in this court that the victim's cell phone was deprived of the victim's cell phone because the victim was pushed the victim's cell phone because he was pushed the victim's cell phone and was on the table, and that the victim got the victim's cell phone was reduced by cutting the victim's cell phone, the victim reported it to the police immediately after putting the defendant's clothes out of the restaurant, and the medical treatment was conducted at a hospital 20,000, and it cannot be evaluated as a considerable act to protect the victim's mobile phone and to protect the infringement of unfair legal interests. Accordingly, the defendant and his defense counsel's above assertion cannot be accepted).

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2016.11.21 2016고합405

-수원지방법원 2016.10.12 2016고정442

-부산지방법원 2015.10.28 2015고정2201

-서울남부지방법원 2012.11.26 2012고정2244

-서울남부지방법원 2019.10.01 2019고합302