logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.11.12 2020고단4543
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 19, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won by the Seoul Southern District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a passenger car B high-speed car.

On 17:21 on 2020. 29. 29. 17:21 on 2020, the Defendant stopped on the side of the 2nd parallel of Pyeongtaek-si Expressway Highway 18.4km (west interest direction) on the west-si Madon Road on the west-si Madon Road on the west-do, Gyeonggi-do, and thus, in such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to accurately manipulate the steering gear to prevent accidents and prevent the occurrence of accidents.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and proceeds normally in the right direction by negligence moving back to the two-lane side of the defendant.

Defendant

The part of the victim C (ma, 41 years old) driving, which found and stopped the vehicle, was the back part of the Defendant vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim by occupational negligence, such as light salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant did not take necessary measures, at the same time and at the same place as the above 1. paragraph of the Road Traffic Act, even if he received the above halog car and damaged it to the repair dog amounting to KRW 1,185,714.

3. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement) by the Defendant, at the F Office located in Gyeonggi-si, E at around 22:27 on the same day, after receiving a report from the said victim to the effect that the said Defendant was deemed to have driven under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant saw the Defendant to have driven under the influence of alcohol, such as making the Defendant take a smell from the G District H of the Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-si Police Station G District, G District Heung, which was called out after receiving a report from the said victim, and making him a smell from one other, and making the blood red, and making it impossible for the Defendant to have driven under the influence of alcohol.

arrow