logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.12.21 2017고단4624
특수절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On July 20, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months for larceny, etc. at the Daegu District Court on July 28, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 28, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On October 27, 2016, the Defendant, in collaboration with B, removed a door-to-door boom 20,000 won in the market price by taking advantage of the gap in which surveillance by the injured party C (42 tax) was neglected while performing the booming work at the 39 CJ’s hub terminal site located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, 1447, a 39 CJ, Gabropoon.

2. On October 29, 2016, the Defendant, in collaboration with B, removed a door-to-door 74 Empt 97,700 won at the market price by taking advantage of the gaps in which surveillance by the victim C(42 tax) was neglected while engaging in door-to-door 1447, a line-to-door 39 C (42 tax) at the 39 CJ terminal site, as it was 1447, a day-to-face 869,000 won in the market price.

3. On November 1, 2016, the Defendant, together with B, committed a theft with three smartphones equivalent to KRW 89,800 in the market price, by breaking a door-to-door 39 C (42 tax) while working at a hub terminal site via 39 CJ, Seoul, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, 1447, a 39C-V20 smartphones.

4. On November 16, 2016, around 02:00, the Defendant: (a) removed a door-to-door stack with the victim C (42 tax)’s surveillance neglected; (b) removed a door-to-door stack with a precious metal set of KRW 500,000 at the market price while performing her door-to-door stack work at the 39 CJ’s hub terminal site (1447, 1447, J. 39C), as the Dae-gu Taedong-gu Daejeon Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. The attendance list and the lost list;

1. Photographs of seized articles;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiry about criminal history and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation report (related to confirmation of suspect A judgment);

1. Criminal facts;

arrow