A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 30, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on June 30, 2010, a fine of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on October 11, 2012, and a fine of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on November 14, 2014, respectively.

1. On March 10, 2015, at around 02:21, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary Measures after Accidents) (hereinafter “Road Traffic Act”), while driving a CSM5 car and driving a e-mail road in D at the time of old U.S., from the surface of the export tower to the surface of the export tower, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of alcohol, and was under the influence of an occupational negligence, which did not properly operate the steering direction and brakes, etc., and was stopped for the atmosphere at the front of the vehicle. The Defendant was under the influence of the FF driver’s G SP car, which was stopped for the atmosphere, and received the part on the right side of the vehicle driving.

The Defendant did not take necessary measures, such as immediately checking the state of damage, even though the Defendant damaged the sprink car with a view to an amount equivalent to KRW 786,720 for the above occupational negligence, and left the scene.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) were driven by the Defendant under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.101%, without obtaining a driver’s license, at a distance of approximately two kilometers from the day before the mutual influence in the old Sim-si to the front day of the new elementary school located in the same Dong through the above traffic accident place at the same time.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act driving a car owned by the Defendant who did not subscribe to mandatory insurance at the above date and at the above place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. The occurrence report and the actual investigation report on traffic accidents;