logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.01.24 2016고단4194
특수폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 28, 2016, the Defendant who damaged property: (a) around 22:40 on October 28, 2016, the victim C was a manager of Kimhae-si B; and (b) the Defendant: (c) took a horse dispute with a woman D who was aware of the usual place where C performed drinking together; and (d) took a microphone with the market price of KRW 100,000, which is managed by the victim C on the floor; and (c) damaged each of them by generating tabless equivalent to KRW 200,000, the market price of which is KRW 200.

2. Special assault Defendant was in a studio at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph by the Defendant’s act of destruction and damage as in the preceding paragraph.

D For the reason that he saw D, he saw the face with the hand floor once, saw the breast part of the breast part by drinking, collects a fire extinguisher, which is a dangerous object continuously kept in the room, when he saw the chest part of the victim's breast part once, and saw the breast part of the victim two times a drinking face.

In this respect, the defendant carried a dangerous object, and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph (Evidence Nos 4 and 8);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 261, 260(1) (a) and 366 of the Criminal Act that choose a penalty, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration of the fact that the defendant is led to confession and reflects against the defendant, that the victim is not punished against the defendant by agreement with the victim, and that the defendant has no record of the same punishment as that of the suspension of execution or heavier, etc.);

arrow