logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2019.07.23 2018가합11669
기술제안 낙찰자 계약무효 확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 22, 2017, the Defendant started the “E design service” (hereinafter “instant design service”) to implement a rearrangement project to reuse the waste landfill site used by the Defendant and extend the period of use.

Method of award: Method of contract for reference: General Competition C Public Notice

5. Other matters and cautions.

(d) will select the highest level of public law by summing up the counter-evaluation points at the absolute evaluation of the business department and the Deliberation Committee on the Selection of Public Law.

(j)to submit a proposal and to select it as a public corporation, the use agreement shall be deemed to be concluded;

Evaluation standards for technical proposals

2.2 Methods of assessment;

(b) Deliberation by the Deliberation Committee on the Selection of Public Law: relative evaluation items - Evaluation of ‘technical field' - Pre-examination by the business department after resolution by the Deliberation Committee on the Selection of Public Law.

(d) application of the relative assessment total compulsory grade system - 10 per cent of the total (65 points) points assigned to enterprises on the basis of the order of scores from the second to the lowest level except for the first order after compiling the scores of relative assessment items - application of forced cars, etc. only when the number of points assigned to enterprises is less than 10 per cent, or when the number of points assigned to the project is less than 10 per cent;

3. Basic principles;

(b) The members for the evaluation of technical proposals (the selection of public law) shall be comprised of not less than seven experts;

(c)The assessment point shall be rounded off from the third decimal place to the second decimal place, and the relative assessment point shall be the arithmetic mean, excluding the highest and lowest points among the assessment points by company;

(in case where the highest or lowest point is multiple, only one person shall apply)

(f) distribution by grade and allocation criteria - relative evaluation shall be conducted by detailed evaluation items;

w. U.S. dollars. The points are divided into Category A: 100 per cent, 90 per cent, 10 per cent, 80 per cent, 70 per cent, 60 per cent, and 10 per cent, and the absolute evaluation shall be subject to the allocation based on the detailed evaluation criteria.

B. The Defendant shall reflect the instant design services on December 18, 2017.

arrow