logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.25 2014가합586011
계약체결이행 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

. Evaluation, etc.

1. Business outline;

(a) Title: Regular selection of items consigned to the National Armed Forces in 2015;

(b) Business contents: The delivery and consignment sale of goods to marinas designated by the National Armed Forces Welfare Corps;

(c) Contract term: October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015 (one year)

4. Detailed guidance by schedule.

(b) Project explanation meeting: The Air Force Center of 10:00 to 15:00 on June 5, 2014;

(g) Assessment period of items in operation (as of July 2014), new items (as of October 1, 2014): One year (as of June 1, 2013 through May 31, 2014): The Armed Forces Welfare Group: (a) released items of 30% per small group (as of the first place of the smallest number of items) by applying the ratio of 60: 30% of the sales volume and sales amount at least 60: At least 1: 20 percent of the total sales volume of items in operation (as of the first place of the smallest number of items), or at least 1.5 percent of the total sales volume of items in operation (in cases of items subject to evaluation of items in operation): The list of items in operation (as of the smallest number of items): The list of items in operation) at least 3: The list of items in operation at least 1: 20 percent of the total sales volume and the list of items in operation at least 1: 3: the list of items in operation of items in force at least 1: at least 20: 1: 3:6: the total 1:

As a result, the Plaintiff’s assessment of the sick Line’s existing operational items by applying 60% to the sales volume (open) during the evaluation period and 40% to the sales amount (cost) during the evaluation period, the Plaintiff’s instant land was included in the list of lower 5 and lower 30% of the total seven items.

Accordingly, the National Armed Forces Welfare Group notifies the Plaintiff of the fact that the instant goods were not selected as the soldiers’ good, and the Plaintiff and the term of the contract are October 1, 2014.

arrow