The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

In light of the fact that the Defendant made a statement on May 30, 2018, the Defendant made a statement on the left chest of the victim at the time of making the first police statement, and then changed the Defendant’s statement to the right chest on the part of the victim on May 30, 2018, the victim’s statement on the part of the damaged part is not consistent, and the victim’s statement on the part of the damaged part is merely consistent with the contents of E’s statement, and thus, it is highly doubtful about the possibility that he made a statement without experience or made a statement between the husband and wife.

B. Unlike the statement very simple and abstract about the crime of this case at the time of the police investigation, as seen earlier, the victim’s passive statement is likely to have been made between the victim and the victim with respect to the forced indecent act case that had been committed prior to the crime of this case.

1.5 Doese or Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese

Compared to the statements related to the instant crime, such as the statement, the victim’s voice, mode of restraint, etc., who made a more concrete and active statement as to the situation at the time of the crime, etc., may also be found to have a difference, such as making a statement more active than when the victim makes a statement of damage to the instant crime.

(c)

E, such as non-fluority and contradictions of the E’s statement, and inconsistencys with the victim’s statement, E, in the first written statement prepared on behalf of the victim between May 12, 2018 and 01:25, which is the date of the crime indicated in the facts charged, only 2 and 3 times the victim’s specific damage to the victim, and 2 and 3 times the left chest.

“On May 30, 2018, the police, “,” but on May 30, 2018, her hand, write down the right side of the wife.