The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as stated in the facts charged, did not have any misunderstanding of facts against the victim.

Nevertheless, the lower court recognized the facts charged and convicted the Defendant.

B. misunderstanding of the legal principles, even if the Defendant was aware of the victim’s bridge part, which was written by misunderstanding the legal principles, does not constitute “scambling” as a result of examining and punishing the part of the victim’s bridge part (this part of the assertion includes the purport of denying the criminal intent). 2. Determination on February 1, 200

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the victim stated the same fact of damage as the facts charged after the occurrence of the case and the draft thereof, and it is difficult to view that the victim’s statement is inconsistent only with the victim’s statement and the victim’s statement as pointed out by the Defendant.

B. Other circumstances revealed by the above evidence: (a) the victim made a detailed statement in detail about the situation immediately before and after the case; (b) the response or response of the victim’s statement; (c) there is no part inconsistent with the objective data; (d) the victim mobilized the method of remaining evidence, such as contact with the male-gu immediately after the case and sending the reported letters; (e) the victim made a reasonable response by using the method of remaining objective evidence; (e) the victim made a statement without concealment of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the Defendant’s state of his primary employment; and (e) the victim sought or

Comprehensively taking account of the absence of evidence to suspect, the victim made a false statement;

It is also difficult to see it.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit, since the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that he met the victim as stated in the facts charged, based on the victim's statement.

B. Legal principles are erroneous.