beta
Text
The defendant shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence against the defendant.
Reasons
1. The Defendant: (a) from March 12, 2018 to September 17, 2019, the Defendant was working in the victim’s “C department store located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu; and (b) on the day, the victim classified the remaining bread from the end of the business on the day to sprinkling, eating, and discarding; and (c) allowed the victim’s employees to take care of sprinkling, eating, and discarding; (d) however, the Defendant educated that the rest of the bread would not bring about to the employees.
On July 8, 2019, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim’s fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorcing around KRW 6,00; and (b) stolen the Defendant’s fluorial fluorial fluorial flus
2. As to the facts charged of this case, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant mainly brought the bread for disposal, and brought the breabbbbing, to the effect that it is partly unreasonable.
The defendant stolen 183,850 won in total or 183,850 won in the market value as of July 8, 2019, including 5 mongs and 3 mongs and 123,850 won in total in the market value. If three mongs consisting of 6,000 won in the market value and 10,000 won in the market value, 60,000 won in total and 123,850 won in total in the market value and 123,850 won in the facts charged are not specified in the facts charged.
According to the 79th page of the evidence record, the disposal and the use of breath are distinguished depending on the type of breath, and according to the facts charged, in the case of breath, the crime of larceny is not established. Thus, what kind of breath that the defendant stolen is an important part for the defendant to exercise his right of defense.
Therefore, among the facts charged in this case, the part that stolen breath equivalent to the total market value of 123,850 won is not specified in the facts charged.
There is a lot of room to view.
The evidence shown as appropriate is D.