logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.05.31 2013고단428
컴퓨터등사용사기
Text

Defendant

A A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, each of whom shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Before the last sentence of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, the Defendant A was sentenced to two years and six years and six months of imprisonment, Defendant B, C, D, E, and F, respectively, and the judgment on October 16, 2012 became final and conclusive on May 10, 2012.

[Name-In-fact-finding] During the phone call in China, etc., the person in charge of the crime committed a false act to identify financial transaction information by misrepresenting himself/herself as an employee of the State agency, and then to enter the information in the bank computer system and transfer money from the account of the victims, and the Defendants conspired to withdraw the amount of money transferred according to the direction of the total amount of withdrawal.

Accordingly, at around 12:00 on January 9, 2012, a name-free person called the victim G and called the public prosecutor working at the Ministry of Justice, and opened a large passbook by stealing the victim's name.In order to prevent the victim's financial transaction information, the victim's false statement is required, inducing the victim to enter the victim's financial transaction information by accessing H to the company bank Internet banking system, and then discovered the victim's financial transaction information, and then transferred the victim's financial transaction information from the company bank bank bank account of the victim to 22,00,000 won from the victim's financial transaction information without authority.

At that time, Defendant A received an order from Defendant B, C, D, E, and F to withdraw the money transferred as above from the total amount of withdrawal that is called the “J team leader” and ordered Defendant B, C, D, E, and F to withdraw the money, and Defendant B, C, D, E, and F withdrawn KRW 126,00 according to that order.

As a result, the Defendants, in collusion with the name-free boxes, entered information without authority in the information processing device, obtained property benefits equivalent to 132,000,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The statement of the police officer with regard to G.

arrow