logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.06.13 2019가단2624
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver 142.68 square meters in two-story stores among the buildings listed in the attached list;

(b)13,400,000 won;

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 5, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant Company entered into a contract with the Defendant Company to lease the second floor (hereinafter “instant real estate”) among the buildings listed in the separate sheet, setting the lease term from April 10, 2013 to April 9, 2014; the lease deposit amount to KRW 3 million; and the rent to KRW 400,000 per month.

B. From January 2014 to January 2019, Defendant Company paid only KRW 8 million out of the aggregate of the rent of KRW 24.4 million for 61 months, and even if the deposit amount is deducted from KRW 3 million, the rent that the Plaintiff was not paid (=24.4 million - KRW 8 million - three million) is KRW 13.4 million.

C. As of the closing date of pleadings, the defendant company occupies the real estate of this case.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Since the lease contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Company terminated due to the expiration of the lease term, the Defendant Company is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, and pay the Plaintiff the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent of KRW 13.4 million which has not been paid out of the rent for January 2019 and KRW 400,000 which has not been paid from February 10, 2019 to the completion date of delivery of the instant real estate.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow