In the case of crimes No. 1 and No. 2 in the judgment of the defendant, imprisonment with prison labor for two months, and crimes No. 3 through No. 5 in the judgment of the defendant, shall be sentenced to four months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 2, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny and one year of suspended sentence, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 11, 2014.

1. On March 31, 2014, the Defendant, at the dormitory of D Company D in Gangwon-gun C, sells “SK smartphone No. 1” to the SK smartphone No. 1.

After posting a letter "," the victim E who reported it, will first deposit money to the victim E who made the contact, send the goods to home.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant receives the price of goods, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above mobile phone normally.

On March 31, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 85,000 won from the damaged party to the post office account under the name of the Defendant as the price for goods.

2. On May 5, 2014, the Defendant, at the dormitory of the said D Company, sold a mobile phone at the seat of the instant D Company, “P phone sales” at the seat of the store with smartphones and fluors.

After posting a letter "," the victim F who reported it, will first deposit money to the victim F who reported it, and will send the goods to the customer F.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant receives the price of goods, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above mobile phone normally.

On May 5, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 80,000 won from the damaged party to the post office account under the name of the Defendant for the use of goods.

3. On October 19, 2014, the Defendant sold one cell phone jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum on a cell phone jum jum jum jum jum.

After posting a letter "," the victim I who reported it will first deposit money to the victim I who made the contact.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant receives the price of goods, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above mobile phone normally.

The defendant.