The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant: (a) misjudgmenting facts, the Defendant: (a) installed the front cover cover; (b) performed the duty of safety management by checking it from time to time; and (c) was installed on the right side of the front cover; and (d) the victim was injured on the left bridge, the victim did not suffer injury due to the instant accident.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court in fact-finding.

① The Defendant is a person in charge of safety management in the apartment construction site performed by C Co., Ltd. at the construction site. In order to discharge sewage emitted from the construction site, the Defendant opened a part of the top lids in neighboring delivery and added sewage pipes, and divided them into sand divers by covering the ceiling.

② At the time of the accident, the victim got over the victim. However, the victim got off the victim's sand lid and lids above, which led to an open man.

(3) The aggrieved person was diagnosed as the damage to the human being on the side of the earth in need of four weeks’ medical treatment at the hospital following the date of the accident and received medical treatment.

(2) The Defendant, at the construction site of this case, has a duty of care to ensure that, when installing sewage pipes, lids can be lided so that the manle can not be opened, and thus, the Defendant cannot be deemed to have taken sufficient measures on the sole basis of the fact that the tent and sand gas can easily move, and that it is divided into a tent and sand gas.

In addition, the victim can be deemed to have suffered bodily injury due to the accident of this case, and the left side of the bridge may fully fall into the right part of the Manle, and such circumstance alone does not affect the acknowledgement of causation.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. The records of this case’s unreasonable sentencing.