1. The judgment of the first instance, including the claim of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor expanded by the trial court, shall be modified as follows:

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (including judgment as to the defense of extinctive prescription) is the same as that of the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (including judgment as to the defense of extinctive prescription). Thus, it

(1) Each of the reasons alleged in the appeal by the Defendant at the trial while making an additional determination is justifiable in the first instance judgment even if all of the evidence presented in the first instance judgment, with the exception of the following reasons, are examined. 【The portion remaining at the time of additional determination 13’s “as of June 13, 2018” shall be construed as “as of April 3, 2019, 14, 9, 16, 10, 10 and 5’s “18,60, 232, 700,” respectively, “The extent of 150, 979, 960, 100, 10, 5, 10, 10, 5, 10, 10, 29, 10, 1305, 360, 165, 10, 360, 165, 10, 10, 2964, 1065, 365,”

The head of a Si/Gun/Gu shall have jurisdiction over the matters provided for in paragraph (1).

1. The age of 18 as at the time of the first diagnosis of the relevant disease or injury: Provided, That the age shall be 18;