1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff extended by this court against the defendants.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the court’s explanation is the same as the reasoning of the court’s decision of the first instance except for the part as stated in paragraph (2) below. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this case by the main text of Article 420 of

2. The higher portion is the co-defendant A and B of the first instance court not more than 3 pages of the judgment of the first instance court, and the indication of the status of the party in the first instance court not more than 3 pages A and B of the judgment, in the “Defendant”, to

Part 8 of the decision of the court of first instance, "I am in bad faith" is "I am in bad faith," and part 14 of the decision of the court of first instance is "W am in bad faith," respectively.

The 10th page 13 of the judgment of the first instance court shall turn the "tele" into "transfer".

3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants ought to be dismissed as it is not correct.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in its conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.