(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.12.21 2018노1142 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.12.21 2018노1142

상해

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding the facts) is that the Defendant was guilty of the facts charged in the instant case, even though the victim’s head was faced with the wheels of the cargo by pushing the victim’s body, although the victim’s head was faced with the cargo, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts.

2. The following circumstances that can be acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the lower court, namely, the victim and the police at the lower court, namely, that “the Defendant was found to the office of the victim on March 19, 2017 and did not pay transport expenses,” and the victim fightd one another outside the office, while taking the body outside the office, and bating the Defendant’s breath, and the victim was faced with the head of the victim with the cargo fat.

“Along with the specific and consistent statement (30 pages of evidence, 81 page of the trial record), and the content of the statement are particularly unreasonable parts or statements in itself, and it can sufficiently be reliable as there is no inconsistency in the contents of the statement, and F, at the police and the lower court on March 19, 2017, the Defendant was faced with the wheels of the victim F, by threatening the victim.

“The Defendant laid down a bridge with the victim’s breath.”

In full view of the facts stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment below, the Defendant’s statements are consistent with the victim’s statements. The Defendant, as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment of the court below, may recognize the fact that the Defendant was faced with the wheels of the freight trucking from the victim’s head.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2016.06.01 2015노2967

-대전지방법원 2017.10.18 2016노3307

-대전지방법원 2017.09.27 2017노543

-대전지방법원 2017.11.08 2017노454

-전주지방법원 정읍지원 2018.08.09 2017고정150