A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 14:00 on June 13, 2014, was introduced from E in the F office operated by Heung-gu E in Heungdong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, the Defendant could produce a mobile phone that can be used normally in substitution for IPS, which is not an OLD, among gallon 3 mobile phoness, and the rest of the domestic Samsung electronic refined parts except liquid parts are expected to be used.

E It is appropriate for E to produce the sample sample of a dry cell phone to the party, and the sampling mobile phone is a mobile phone that is produced newly by using an IPS at a fixed amount and the remainder is a mobile phone that is newly produced by using Samsung Electronic Products Parts.

When sending down payment, 5,00 sets of cell phones, which are the same mobile phone as the sampling mobile phone within one month, will be produced and supplied at 2,40,000 won per set.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, the defendant did not directly produce the above sampling cell phone, even though the above mobile phone was not a substitute for IPS, but a mobile phone produced in Samsung electronics. The defendant did not have any facilities capable of manufacturing or assembling the mobile phone, and the defendant did not have any capacity to directly supply and demand the parts of Samsung Electronic Products in Korea, and even if he received money from the injured party as the down payment, he did not have the intent or ability to supply 5,000 sets of the mobile phone identical to the sampling cell phone to the victim because he was willing to consume it within a several days for personal debt repayment, etc.

Around June 13, 2014, the Defendant received from the injured party a total of KRW 36 million from the Defendant’s new bank account (ju) to the Defendant’s new bank account, around June 17, 2014, KRW 30 million to the said account, around June 18, 2014, and KRW 54 million to the said account, around June 18, 2014, and KRW 120 million in total.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect to E, I, and J;

1. Each prosecutor's office against the defendant;