logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2017.11.23 2017누12511
부당노동행위구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate even if all the evidence submitted in the court of

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is based on the reasoning for the first instance court's ruling, i.e., "the time limit for inquiry" in Section 7, Section 9 of the first instance court's ruling as "the time limit for inquiry", and ii0 of the same face, except for the addition of the following parts after the second 20 of the judgment, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of

【) The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Plaintiff’s collective bargaining request on the ground that the Plaintiff did not submit the list of union members is against the principle of trust and good faith, since it is unreasonable for the Plaintiff to additionally demand the Plaintiff to submit the list of union members even though the Plaintiff’

However, even after a negotiation trade union becomes final and conclusive, it is necessary to verify whether the pertinent bargaining trade union is a legitimate negotiating entity. As seen earlier, it is necessary to verify whether one of the Plaintiff’s negotiating members is a member of the Plaintiff, and the remaining employers of this case, other than Daegu Metropolitan City, which confirmed that one of the Plaintiff’s negotiating members is working in the relevant autonomous Gu and responded to collective bargaining with the Plaintiff, still need to verify whether the Plaintiff is a member of the Plaintiff. Thus, the mere fact alleged by the Plaintiff is unreasonable.

It is difficult to regard it as a violation of good faith or trust.

A person shall be appointed.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow