logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.10.28 2015나2018334
양수금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows. Each "Witness H" of the 2, 19 and 21 of the 2, 2, 19 and 21 of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed, except for the reasons for the rejection of each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 19 and 20 (including the number of pages) (including the number of pages), which is insufficient to recognize the fact that E is the contractor of the construction of this case, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow