1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The defendant is the implementer of a district urban development project with the following contents, and the plaintiffs are the owners of the land in the project area as shown in the attached Table 1 list:

B. On December 13, 2002, the Defendant’s application for the designation of an urban development zone was completed 1) Jeonnam Do Governor (hereinafter “Naman area”) another part of the national highways 2 lines (E) among the D Dailys (hereinafter “E”)

2) On December 13, 2005, the Do governor of Jeonnam-do announced a decision to revise a A urban planning to designate a specific use area of the said area as a natural green belt as a Class-II general residential area, and a Class-I district unit planning zone. 2) On December 13, 2005, the Do governor of Jeonnam-do announced G to convert some specific use areas of the said area into a Class-II quasi-residential area, and the installation of urban planning facilities such as construction of roads, etc., thereby establishing a district unit planning for the remaining area.

3) On January 22, 2008, the Defendant is an area north of the 2nd line of the national highways among D class D class D units from January 22, 2006 to 2025 (hereinafter referred to as “North-west area”).

(4) On February 13, 2008, the Defendant designated and publicly announced the C development activity district as a permitted zone to prevent the development of difficulties caused by development activities and to implement the housing site development project in a timely period, in order to prevent the development of difficulties caused by development activities and to implement the housing site development project in a timely period.

5) On March 27, 2009, the Defendant: (a) on March 27, 2009, designated a special-purpose zone of 372,330 square meters among the above North northwest area as a Class-I district unit planning zone; and (b) on July 13, 2009, the Do governor designated a specific-purpose zone of 372,330 square meters as a Class-I district unit planning zone.

7 The defendant shall be 30,884 square meters of EDR on October 5, 2009.