1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Details of the instant disposition

A. The Plaintiff’s status as the Plaintiff is a company established on December 2, 1996 with the hotel business as the objective business, and operated a tourist hotel (hereinafter “instant hotel”) on July 12, 2005 with the trade name “bigtotoria hotel” on a total of six parcels, including the instant land, etc., in which the Plaintiff reported the business of accommodation to the Defendant on July 12, 2005.

B. On June 27, 2012, the Do Governor of Jeonnam-do changed a special-purpose area of 10 square meters, 102,754 square meters, Maranam-do, Daranam-do, into a planned control area, and newly established a youth training center as a planned control area (hereinafter “determination of the instant planned planning facility”), and publicly announced the determination of the planned planning facility as prescribed by Article 2012-209, Jeonnam-do.

C. On December 26, 2012, the Defendant, who has the Defendant’s implementation plan, designated the Office of Education of Gwangju Metropolitan City as the project implementer of an urban planning facility project (hereinafter “instant project”) according to the determination of the instant urban planning facility project (hereinafter “instant project”), and authorized the implementation plan for dividing the instant project into the following contents (hereinafter “instant disposition”). The Plaintiff’s location and name of the project site in the instant project implementation zone was publicly announced as prescribed in Article 2012-69. The Plaintiff’s location and name of the project site: The type and name of the project site located in the area where the instant project was implemented: The type and name of the project for the 10-day project in the Dolsan-gun Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City City Special Metropolitan City City

The plaintiff's administrative appeal claim and the administrative appeals commission's decision were made through legitimate procedures prescribed in the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and the Enforcement Decree of the same Act.

juveniles;