1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 3, 2007, Defendant A was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million on July 3, 2007, with a fine of KRW 1.5 million due to a violation of Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) in support of Sungnam branch of Suwon branch, and on May 14, 2009, a fine of KRW 2 million was issued in the same court as the same crime, respectively.

Defendant

A On November 13, 2017, around 21:12, around the 21:12 Jeju, driven a E 130-car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.105% from the 100-meter section from the front of the 2nd apartment of the 36th city in Jeju to the front road of the Gael church.

Defendant B, on December 7, 2017, at around 22:57, 2017, abused the victim A (37 years old) within the “G restaurant” located in Seogpopo City F, and against this, Defendant B, on the hand floor, caused the victim’s injury by taking the victim’s left part one time, and caused the victim’s injury by taking two times into account the victim’s parts, such as the victim’s left part, and the victim was in need of approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 3300"

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (Attachment to a summary order), summary order "2018 Gool 1138";

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Each police statement made to A or H;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Ctv images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Defendant B who is selected to be sentenced to imprisonment with labor: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines (influent crimes and circumstances agreed with victims)

1. Defendant A who is to be mitigated: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act ( Taking into account the following factors: (i) the fact that the person is against whom the punishment is imposed; (ii) the fact that the person has no record of committing an offense exceeding the fine; and (iii) the fact that the person

1. Defendant B who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who has been suspended from execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the reason for the reduction of the amount of the above punishment has been repeated;