logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2015.01.14 2014고단309
도로교통법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who has violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and the Automobile Accident Compensation Guarantee Act.

On August 14, 2014, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license, driven the said car from around 2 km to the road located in the territory of the funeral Dong, Young-si on August 14, 201, and from around 23:33 on the same day, the Defendant was driving the said car not covered by mandatory insurance from around 2 km to the Drki in the same city.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving of a passenger vehicle as set forth in paragraph 1.

On August 14, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car at around 23:33, and driven the two-lane road in front of the said Duski, one lane from the funeral service Dong to the Young-dong, leading to about 50 to 60km each hour.

At the same time, since there are several bends and bends at night, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering gear and brakes depending on the lane by taking into account well the steering vis-vis.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a stroke while driving a stroke line on the part of the Defendant, committed the act of driving a straight line, obstructed and delivered a letter-lane facing the median line, and received the order in the order of the front part of the said car, such as the victim E-owned building outer wall, etc., and the outside of the “G fixed-land store” store operated by the victim F, who moved into the building, and one of the middle laundry machine and the iron board outside the “I” store operated by the victim H, which was operated by the said victim H.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, destroyed the above building owned by the victim E in an amount equivalent to KRW 1,050,00,000 for repair costs, to cover the amount equivalent to KRW 3,810,000 for repair costs of outside facilities, such as freezing and cooling facility pipes, which are owned by the victim F, and to cover the amount equivalent to KRW 430,00 for replacement costs of the victim H.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow