1. Defendant E is each of the Plaintiff’s reference in the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1 among the land size of 686.7 square meters in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

1. 원고는 이 사건 청구원인으로, 피고들이 원고 소유의 서울 강동구 G 대 6886.7㎡ 중 별지 2 도면 표시 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉤, ㉥, ㉦, ㉧, ㉠이 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 (가) 부분 50㎡ 지상에 시설물을 설치하는 등으로 점유하고 있다고 주장하면서 그 시설물의 철거 및 위 토지의 인도를 구한다.

2. In full view of the purport of the arguments and arguments as a result of the survey and appraisal by the Korea Land Information Corporation (Gangdong branch), Defendant E owns a warehouse on the land of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant E owns a warehouse on the ground of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, and it can be recognized that the warehouse attached reference was installed on the part of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1 in sequence connected with each of the points of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1 in sequence, and there is no counter-proof.

Therefore, Defendant E is obligated to remove a warehouse on the ground of 3.9 square meters of land in the above "A" portion and deliver the part of the land to the Plaintiff with the exclusion of interference with the ownership.

However, there is no evidence to prove that Defendant B, C, D, and F owns or occupies the above land on the ground of the land owned by the Plaintiff, and there is no evidence to prove that Defendant E occupies the land owned by the Plaintiff or owns the facilities on the ground other than the above part of “A” land.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant E is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims and claims against the other defendants are without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.