Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Punishment of the crime

On August 30, 2010, the Defendants conspired and submitted a false marriage report to a public official in charge of the Songpa-gu Office located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu without a real intention to marry and had the said public official know of the fact registered as a true marriage by the Defendants in the family register information processing system, which is a public electronic record, and around that time, stored and operated the above public electronic record data processing system, which is the public electronic record recording.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make a false report to a public official to record false facts in the family information processing system of the same electronic records as the original of the authentic deed and exercised a public electronic record stating false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Marriage relation certificate and family relation certificate;

1. Status of individual entry and departure;

1. Each monthly rent contract;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 228(1), 229, and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants selected to be sentenced to punishment: Determination of each fine (the fact that they are confessions and reflects in the rear and rear crimes, the circumstances leading to the crime in this case, the circumstances after the crime, the criminal records, the age, character and conduct, environment, family relations, etc. of the Defendants); and

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.