1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) On June 1, 2015, the part of the Deceased on June 1, 2015, which died on June 1, 2015 while the lawsuit of this case was pending, it is recognized that the deceased 7,8 were diversed by the following as follows. At the fourth level, at the time of sole use of propool, 30 through 40 g or 0.5 g or 0.5 g can be invested first to healthy adults under the age of 65 and, as necessary, 10 through 20 g of the deceased’s daily life at the 4th level below. At the fourth level, it is necessary to reduce 50% or more of the deceased’s diversity without any high diversity and 65 or more, and at the bottom of the 5th level, it is necessary for a prosecutor to observe the part of the deceased’s divers and 7th level below the Seoul University at its bottom without any further observation by the court.