logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.06.23 2015나2027413
손해배상(의)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under paragraph (2) is revoked.

2...

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the fifth side, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital added the following parts (in addition to the assertion of violation of the duty to explain) between the part of the 7th instance court’s part of the 7th instance court’s 7th instance court’s 7th instance court’s 7th instance court’s 7th instance court’s 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 2002. The Defendant hospital did not specifically explain to the Deceased before the organization examination that after the organization examination, after the 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 7th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 4th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 4th 8th 8th 8th 8th 4th 8th 8th 8th 1st 8th 8th 1st 3th 8th 8th 13th 22.

) From the 8th end to the 5th end of the Act, the following parts shall be added to the 5th end, and the outbreak of blood after the brain examination shall be at the level of medical care at the time.

arrow